Logo

AMP in 2026: Optimisation Guide

You’re browsing on your phone, you tap a promising result, and… the page crawls. Images pop in late, the layout jumps, a newsletter modal blocks the content, and you’re stuck waiting for the “Buy” button to become clickable. Most people do exactly what you did in your draft: they hit Back and choose a faster competitor.

That frustration is the exact problem AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages) set out to solve.

AMP is an open-source framework for building web pages that load quickly – especially on mobile – by using a restricted component set, performance-focused rules, and (often) distribution via caches. In its early years, AMP became popular with publishers because it delivered consistently fast article pages and, at one time, it gave eligibility advantages in certain Google surfaces.

But the web changed. Google’s search experience evolved to focus much more on real-world page performance and user experience metrics (Core Web Vitals), and AMP stopped being a “must-have” for visibility. Google has long since removed the requirement that pages be AMP to appear in Top Stories, shifting attention toward broader page experience and news content policies.

So where does that leave AMP today?

In 2026, AMP is best thought of as one technical approach to delivering fast pages—not the approach. For some sites, it still makes sense. For many others, investing in a high-performing responsive site (without maintaining separate AMP templates) is more practical and sustainable.

This guide covers:

What Is AMP?

AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages) is a web framework that enforces performance best practices through:

1. A limited, performance-safe subset of HTML (often called AMP HTML)

2. A component library (AMP components like amp-img, amp-video, etc.)

3. Validation rules (your page must pass AMP validation to be treated as AMP)

4. Optional caching and pre-rendering (many AMP pages are served from caches, depending on platform and integration)

AMP pages are designed to render quickly by controlling what can block rendering and by encouraging predictable resource loading.

The basic idea

AMP tries to avoid common causes of slow mobile pages:

AMP in 2026: Still Relevant or Not?

The honest answer: it depends on your site type and your team’s constraints.

A key shift is that AMP is no longer required for Top Stories eligibility (this change was announced ahead of Google’s Page Experience updates and has been in effect for years).

At the same time, Google encourages site owners to focus on Core Web Vitals as part of measuring real-world user experience.

What that means strategically

Benefits of AMP (Modernised)

1) Faster perceived load on mobile

AMP’s strict rules can produce very fast pages—especially for content-heavy articles. You’re starting from a performance-focused baseline.

2) Better user experience on weak connections

Because AMP strongly encourages optimised media and discourages heavy scripts, it can feel smoother on unstable mobile networks.

3) More consistent performance across templates

On some platforms, AMP reduces the risk that individual authors or plugins will accidentally slow down pages.

4) Potentially improved engagement signals

Faster pages tend to reduce abandonment and increase scroll depth—especially on mobile. This isn’t “AMP magic”; it’s the downstream benefit of speed and stability.

5) Cleaner layouts and fewer layout shifts

AMP’s emphasis on declaring dimensions helps reduce unexpected jumps (CLS), if your ads and embeds are also configured properly.

Limitations and Risks You Should Acknowledge

A modern AMP article should be transparent about trade-offs:

1) Two versions = double maintenance

If you run canonical + AMP, you now have two templates to keep consistent: content, headings, internal links, structured data, and tracking.

2) Feature constraints

Certain custom JavaScript behaviours and UI patterns don’t translate cleanly into AMP.

3) Analytics and attribution complexity

Cross-domain and cache-delivered experiences can complicate analytics setups if not carefully configured.

4) SEO risks if canonical/AMP pairing is wrong

Misconfigured canonical relationships can cause duplication or indexing confusion. Google provides clear guidance on canonical consolidation principles.

5) The “AMP = rankings” idea is outdated

AMP is not an automatic ranking boost. Google’s visible emphasis is on overall page experience and performance measurement.

When AMP Still Makes Sense

AMP can be a smart choice if most of the following are true:

If you’re an ecommerce business, service site, or lead-gen site with complex interactive UI, AMP is often not worth the constraints-unless you’re using AMP only for informational content pages (blogs, guides, editorial landing pages).

How AMP Works

AMP HTML

AMP pages use standard HTML plus AMP-specific attributes/components, but with restrictions that reduce render-blocking behaviour and enforce predictable layouts.

AMP Components

Instead of arbitrary scripts, you use AMP components for common needs:

Limitations and Risks You Should Acknowledge

1) Two versions = double maintenance

If you run canonical + AMP, you now have two templates to keep consistent: content, headings, internal links, structured data, and tracking.

2) Feature constraints

Certain custom JavaScript behaviours and UI patterns don’t translate cleanly into AMP.

Limitations and Risks You Should Acknowledge

1) Two versions = double maintenance

If you run canonical + AMP, you now have two templates to keep consistent: content, headings, internal links, structured data, and tracking.

2) Feature constraints

Certain custom JavaScript behaviours and UI patterns don’t translate cleanly into AMP.

3) Analytics and attribution complexity

Cross-domain and cache-delivered experiences can complicate analytics setups if not carefully configured.

4) SEO risks if canonical/AMP pairing is wrong

Misconfigured canonical relationships can cause duplication or indexing confusion. Google provides clear guidance on canonical consolidation principles.

5) The “AMP = rankings” idea is outdated

AMP is not an automatic ranking boost. Google’s visible emphasis is on overall page experience and performance measurement.

When AMP Still Makes Sense

AMP can be a smart choice if most of the following are true:

If you’re an ecommerce business, service site, or lead-gen site with complex interactive UI, AMP is often not worth the constraints – unless you’re using AMP only for informational content pages (blogs, guides, editorial landing pages).

How AMP Works

AMP HTML

AMP pages use standard HTML plus AMP-specific attributes/components, but with restrictions that reduce render-blocking behaviour and enforce predictable layouts.

AMP Components

Instead of arbitrary scripts, you use AMP components for common needs:

Validation

AMP pages should pass validation to ensure they comply with the framework’s rules.

Discoverability and pairing

If you publish both AMP and non-AMP versions, you must make them discoverable to each other (AMP points to canonical; canonical points to AMP). AMP’s own documentation explains this pairing approach.

How to Optimise AMP Pages: A Practical Checklist

How-to-Optimise-pages-Computing Australia Group

Below is a modernised, real-world optimisation checklist that aligns with performance, SEO, and maintainability.

1) Ensure feature parity

AMP shouldn’t feel broken compared to the canonical page.

Make sure these work properly:

AMP shouldn’t feel broken compared to the canonical page.

2) Use correct canonical + AMP annotations

This is non-negotiable for SEO clarity.

This mutual relationship helps search engines understand which page is primary and how they relate. AMP documentation covers discoverability patterns, and Google provides broader guidance on canonical consolidation.

3) Keep SEO elements consistent

For each canonical/AMP pair, align:

If the AMP page has trimmed navigation, that’s fine – but the content intent and topic targeting should remain consistent.

4) Use SEO-friendly URL patterns

If you’re differentiating AMP URLs, common patterns include:

Whatever you choose:

5) Validate AMP regularly

AMP can silently break after theme/plugin/CMS updates.

Set a process to:

6) Optimise images the “boring” way

AMP helps, but your media choices still dominate performance.

Do this:

7) Control third-party scripts and tags

The fastest AMP pages are the ones that don’t try to behave like a fully scripted app.

Audit:

Every extra tag is a performance tax.

8) Make ads fast, stable, and measurable

Ads are often where AMP pages fail.

Best practices:

9) Track performance with real UX metrics

Google’s guidance on Core Web Vitals focuses on real-world experience measurement.

Measure both versions:

AMP can be fast but convert worse if it strips key trust elements, navigation, or CTAs.

10) Don’t assume you “don’t need a sitemap”

Your draft says “No need of sitemap.” That’s not a safe universal recommendation.

Even if Google can discover pages through links, sitemaps are still useful for:

Treat sitemaps as best practice unless you have a strong reason not to.

Should You Build AMP Today - or Optimise Non-AMP Instead?

A practical decision rule:

Choose AMP if…

Choose non-AMP performance optimisation if…

In many cases, the best modern SEO outcome comes from:

Google’s public documentation places heavy emphasis on CWV as a way to understand real user experience.

SEO Element Consistency

SEO visibility can be negatively affected if the SEO elements used in both versions are not consistent. So, make sure you use the same codes for structured data, H1s and alternative image text as those used in the canonical version.

Mobile-friendly sites are a must in this era of mobile dominancy. The practices mentioned above will help you optimise the AMP and improve its performance considerably, leading to a higher ranking. Need to know more about AMP or SEO related subjects? Contact our SEO experts or email at sales@computingaustralia.group.

Jargon Buster

SERPs – Search Engine Results Pages – Google’s response to a user’s search query includes featured snippets, organic results, paid results etc.

Optimise – A process that modifies how a campaign is delivering, boosting its performance. It includes improving any metric like CTR, Page Load Speed etc.

Sitemap – An XML file that displays all the URLs you want users to discover.

FAQ

No. AMP can help performance, and performance can help user outcomes—but AMP itself is not a guaranteed ranking boost. Modern visibility is more tied to content quality, relevance, authority, and measurable user experience.

No—AMP has not been required for Top Stories for years.

Yes, especially for publishers who want consistent fast article templates and have an established AMP workflow.

AMP often helps you avoid common performance mistakes, but it doesn’t guarantee speed if you overload the page with heavy ads, third-party scripts, or unoptimised media. You still need image compression, sensible ad layouts, and clean tracking setups.

Core Web Vitals matter more as a framework for measuring real user experience across all pages. AMP can be one way to achieve better CWV, but it’s not required.