by The Computing Australia Group | Smart Software
Choices
Search engine optimisation fuels sustainable, compounding growth – but it isn’t instant. Any agency promising “page-one in a week” is (at best) over-optimistic and (at worst) using shortcuts that can damage your brand. Those shortcuts sit under black hat SEO: tactics designed to manipulate rankings by breaking search-engine guidelines rather than serving people.
This guide explains what black hat SEO is, why it’s risky, the most common tactics (so you can spot them), how penalties work, and practical, ethical alternatives that deliver durable results.
Black hat vs. white hat vs. grey hat
- Black hat SEO: Manipulates ranking signals by violating search engine policies (e.g., buying links, cloaking, doorway pages). Short-term lifts are common; long-term outcomes are penalties, lost traffic, and reputation damage.
- White hat SEO: Aligns with guidelines; focuses on user value, accessibility, performance, relevance, and trustworthy acquisition of links/mentions. Results compound over time and survive algorithm updates.
- Grey hat SEO: Sits in the fuzzy middle - tactics not explicitly outlawed but designed to game systems (e.g., aggressive expired-domain use, “borderline” anchor tactics). Grey often turns black when policies tighten.
Rule of thumb: If the primary beneficiary is an algorithm rather than a human, you’re drifting toward black hat.
Why black hat SEO is so risky
1. Poor user experience
Tactics like keyword stuffing or intrusive doorway pages harm readability, credibility, and conversion.
2. Short-lived wins
Updates to spam-detection systems roll out continuously. Gains evaporate as soon as a loophole closes.
3. Site-wide impact
“Bad neighbourhood” links, cloaking, or spam can taint an entire domain – not just the page that used them.
4. Financial loss
Traffic drops mean fewer leads and sales; remediation costs (forensics, cleanup, reconsideration) add to the bill.
5. Brand and legal risk
Fake reviews, scraped content, or hacked content can breach consumer law and platform terms (and destroy trust).
Common black hat tactics (with ethical alternatives)
Below are the most prevalent black hat techniques we see—and what to do instead.
1. Paid links and link schemes
What it is: Paying for links (cash, gifts, “guest post packages”, PBN rentals) to inflate PageRank. Link swaps at scale and “sponsorships” for followed links also count.
Why it’s harmful: Distorts relevance/authority signals; typical footprints are easy to detect (identical anchors, low-quality sites, irrelevant placements).
Do instead:
- Earn links with newsworthy assets: original research, data visualisations, calculators, free tools, compelling PR angles.
- Use digital PR: expert commentary, local stories, partnerships with relevant organisations (with proper disclosure).
- When you sponsor something, use rel="sponsored" and keep expectations on brand visibility—not ranking juice.
2. Keyword stuffing
What it is: Overloading pages with repetitive keywords or “city + service” strings to rank for variations.
Why it’s harmful: Degrades readability; search engines discount it; visitors bounce.
Do instead:
- Optimise for intent and topical coverage: satisfy the task a searcher is trying to complete.
- Use natural language and semantic variations.
- Structure with clear H1/H2s, concise paragraphs, and supportive media.
3. Cloaking
What it is: Showing one set of content to crawlers and another to users.
Why it’s harmful: Direct violation of policies; often used to hide spam, malware, or irrelevant content.
Do instead:
- Use dynamic rendering responsibly (if needed for heavy JS) but serve equivalent content.
- Tailor UX by audience (e.g., pricing by region) while keeping content substantially consistent.
4. Sneaky or irrelevant redirects
What it is: Sending users to an unrelated page while showing crawlers an “optimised” version; or mass-redirecting old URLs to loosely related targets to transfer authority.
Why it’s harmful: Breaks user expectations; algorithmic systems catch patterns.
Do instead:
- Redirect only when intent and content match.
- Maintain one-to-one mappings during site migrations with up-to-date sitemaps and internal links.
5. Doorway pages
What it is: Thin pages created to rank for many variations (e.g., “plumber in [suburb]”) that funnel to the same destination.
Why it’s harmful: Adds duplication and low-value content; confuses users.
Do instead:
- Build robust local pages only for areas you genuinely serve, with unique proof points (team photos, case studies, hours, reviews).
- Consolidate thin variants into comprehensive guides with anchors.
6. Private Blog Networks (PBNs)
What it is: Interlinked network of sites built on expired domains to pass authority.
Why it’s harmful: Clear footprints (hosting, WHOIS, link patterns); often low editorial standards.
Do instead:
- Pursue editorial, relevant coverage through relationships, PR, and contributions to respected publications.
- Earn mentions via partnerships, events, webinars, charities, or industry bodies.
7. Spun or mass-generated content (including low-quality AI spam)
What it is: Programmatically combined/synonym-spun text to pump out pages at scale.
Why it’s harmful: Lacks originality or expertise; triggers quality systems; damages trust.
Do instead:
- Use AI as a drafting aid, then add human expertise, original data, and clear author accountability (bio, credentials).
- Establish editorial standards and fact-checking.
8. Hidden text and links
What it is: White text on white background, font-size 0, CSS off-screen, or sneaky widgets injecting links.
Why it’s harmful: Deceptive; commonly used in hacks.
Do instead:
- Keep all indexable content visible and accessible.
- Use skip links/ARIA for accessibility, not to hide content for ranking.
9. Comment/forum spam & profile link spam
What it is: Spraying links across guestbooks, profiles, and comment sections.
Why it’s harmful: Adds no value; creates a toxic backlink profile.
Do instead:
- Join relevant communities genuinely - answer questions with depth; links should be rare, no-followed where appropriate.
- Invest in owned assets (guides, tools) that earn shares organically.
10. Manipulative structured data
What it is: Marking up fake ratings, wrong authorship, or misleading product info to trigger rich results.
Why it’s harmful: Misleads users; can trigger manual actions and removal of rich results.
Do instead:
- Use schema to reflect reality (real reviews, accurate pricing/availability).
- Validate schema and keep it in sync with on-page content.
11. Clickbait/engagement bait
What it is: Titles or inline widgets engineered to spike CTR/dwell time with misleading promises or artificial timers.
Why it’s harmful: Increases pogo-sticking, erodes trust.
Do instead:
- Write accurate, compelling titles and meta descriptions; deliver the promise above the fold.
- Improve page experience (speed, clarity, navigation).
12. Hacked content, injected pages, and parasite SEO
What it is: Compromised sites used to host spam; or renting powerful domains to host unrelated content.
Why it’s harmful: Security risk, reputational damage, and policy violations.
Do instead:
- Maintain strong security (WAF, updates, least-privilege, MFA, backups).
- Keep your content aligned with your brand; no “renting” your domain to unrelated third parties.
How search engines detect black hat activity
- Manual reviews & user reports: Spam teams investigate patterns, tip-offs, and suspicious behaviours.
- Algorithmic signals: Link-spam systems, content-quality systems, helpful-content systems, and duplicate/similarity checks.
- Technical fingerprints: Hosting clusters, CMS footprints, link graphs, repeated anchors, schema mismatches.
- Behavioural signals: Low satisfaction, quick returns to SERPs, thin engagement.
You won’t always get a friendly email before impact lands. Traffic can drop without a visible “manual action” if quality systems decide your pages don’t deserve ranking.
Penalties: what they are and how long they last
- Algorithmic demotions: Automatic down-weighting of pages or the whole site. Recovery happens after you fix issues and systems recrawl/reprocess (could be days to months).
- Manual actions: Human-applied penalties documented in Search Console. Effects range from partial matches (e.g., links ignored) to site-wide deindexing. Recovery requires cleanup and a reconsideration request.
Duration: Depends on severity and cleanup. Some sites bounce back in weeks; others take quarters—especially if link equity was mostly artificial.
Recovery plan if you’ve used black hat SEO
1. Confirm scope
- Check Google Search Console for manual actions and security issues.
- Crawl your site (Screaming Frog, Sitebulb) to map thin/duplicate pages, redirects, and schema anomalies.
2. Audit backlinks
- Export links from Search Console + third-party tools.
- Classify by relevance, quality, anchor usage, and risk (PBNs, directories, comment spam).
3. Remove what you control
- Kill doorway pages, hidden content, and spammy widgets.
- Fix redirects to intent-matched targets; restore useful legacy pages if mass-redirected incorrectly.
4. Request link removals
- Contact webmasters to remove toxic links; document outreach attempts.
5. Disavow as a last resort
- Disavow domains/URLs you cannot remove and that are clearly manipulative. (Use sparingly and document rationale.)
6. Rebuild with quality
- Consolidate thin pages into comprehensive resources.
- Add E-E-A-T signals: author bios, credentials, citations, case studies, and transparent contact details.
- Pursue editorial mentions via PR and partnerships - no paid placements for followed links.
7. Submit a reconsideration request (manual actions only)
- Be honest: explain what happened, what you removed, evidence of outreach, and the process changes you’ve implemented (governance, training, tools).
- Keep it factual and concise; attach logs/spreadsheets as proof.
8. Monitor & iterate
- Track key pages and queries; watch log files and crawl stats; review backlinks monthly for relapse.
Governance: vetting SEO partners and spotting red flags
Ask vendors:
- “How do you acquire links?” (Look for editorial PR, partnerships, and content-led strategies - not “placements”.)
- “What happens if tactics trigger a penalty?” (They should own remediation steps.)
- “How do you measure quality?” (Talk about intent, SERP analysis, UX, conversions - not just positions.)
- “Can you show recent case studies?” (Verify durability beyond one update cycle.)
Red flags:
- Guarantees of rankings or timelines
- “We’ll handle links; don’t worry about it”
- Emphasis on private networks, guest post packages, or “DR 50+ links for $X”
- Reports dominated by vanity metrics and thin “articles” on irrelevant sites
Myths vs. facts
- Myth: “Everyone buys links; you must do it to compete.”
- Fact: Many high-performing sites win via brand, PR, content depth, and UX. Shortcuts jeopardise long-term ROI.
- Myth: “Black hat works until you’re big enough to switch.”
- Fact: Toxic link profiles and thin-content footprints are hard to unwind and can delay growth for months.
- Myth: “Disavow fixes everything.”
- Fact: Disavow helps when you can’t remove links; it won’t bail out thin content, doorway pages, or cloaking.
- Myth: “AI content is banned.”
- Fact: Low-quality mass-generated content is the issue. High-quality, expert-reviewed content is fine.
Jargon buster
- Rich snippets / Rich results – Enhanced search listings (e.g., stars, FAQs) derived from structured data that help users understand your page faster.
- Search algorithm – Systems that evaluate many signals (relevance, quality, experience, links) to rank pages for a query.
- Structured data (Schema.org) – Machine-readable markup that explains entities and attributes on your page.
- E-E-A-T – Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness; signals that a source is credible.
- Doorway page – A low-value page created to rank for a specific query and funnel users elsewhere.
- PBN (Private Blog Network) – A cluster of sites built to pass link authority between them.
- Manual action – A human-applied penalty visible in Search Console.
- Disavow – A file submitted to tell Google to ignore certain backlinks in ranking evaluations.
FAQ
Is black hat SEO illegal?
Generally no, but it violates platform policies and can intersect with illegal behaviour (e.g., hacking, fake reviews). Even when not illegal, it’s unethical and risky.
How can I tell if my previous agency used black hat tactics?
Look for an unnatural anchor-text profile, many links from unrelated/low-quality sites, doorway pages, or thin content at scale. Check Search Console for manual actions; run a backlink audit.
If I stop black hat tactics now, will my rankings crash?
If rankings were propped up by manipulative links or thin pages, some volatility is likely. Replace them with higher-value content and legitimate mentions to stabilise and grow.
Should I use the disavow tool?
Only when you have clear evidence of manipulative or spammy links you cannot remove. Over-disavowing can throw away good equity.
Are guest posts always black hat?
No. Thoughtful contributions to relevant publications with editorial oversight are fine – especially when links are earned naturally or marked nofollow/sponsored. “Guest post packages” and link farms are not.
